<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/">
  <title>Functional Programming</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://jfxtras.org/portal/portal/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=10184&amp;threadId=45812" />
  <subtitle>Functional Programming</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <title>Functional Programming</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://jfxtras.org/portal/portal/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=10184&amp;messageId=45811" />
    <author>
      <name>Erlan Sergaziev</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://jfxtras.org/portal/portal/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=10184&amp;messageId=45811</id>
    <updated>2010-01-07T20:50:26Z</updated>
    <published>2010-01-07T20:50:26Z</published>
    <summary type="html">JFXtras has added nice FP functions like fold.&lt;br /&gt;But by adding a few more of these functions, e.g. map, filter, zip etc. the functional paradigm of JavaFX could become on par (or better) with Ruby/Python.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I know that one can achieve map and filter effects using a different syntax, but it would be good to have a consistent set of FP functions.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Erlan Sergaziev</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-07T20:50:26Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

